Over the past 15 years, there has been a sharp rise in lawsuits brought against American companies, as well as foreign companies with a substantial U.S. presence, that are premised on alleged personal or environmental injuries occurring abroad. These cases raise the question of whether U.S. courts should be the venue for cases concerning conduct occurring outside the territory of the United States. They have also been characterized by controversial and abusive tactics by plaintiffs and their lawyers.
Many of those transnational lawsuits have been filed in the U.S. by plaintiffs’ class action firms, public interest attorneys and non-governmental organizations. Some have been filed in federal courts under the 200-year old Alien Tort Statute (ATS), while many more have been brought in state courts under common law theories of liability.
These cases raise several concerns. One is the use of U.S. courts for adjudicating disputes that occurred outside of the country. It is a generally established principle that U.S. courts should not hear cases involving foreign conduct unless there is a significant nexus to the United States. By undermining this principle, these cases set a precedent that could be used to expose Americans to litigation in foreign courts over conduct occurring in the United States.
Equally troubling are the tactics used in these cases. According to ILR’s study Think Globally, Sue Locally, transnational cases are characterized by a number of features, including aggressive media tactics, organized protests and boycotts of corporate defendants, political pressure and, in some cases, outright fraud and abuse by plaintiffs’ lawyers. In the major transnational case against Chevron in Ecuador, four federal courts have found the proceedings tainted by fraud.
In April 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum that claims of wrongful conduct on foreign soil cannot be brought in U.S. courts under the ATS. This ruling has substantially limited the use of the ATS in transnational cases, but does not deter cases brought under state common law. A complete list of lawsuits against corporations under the Alien Tort Statute can be found here.
August 11, 2015
This paper explores the effect of the U.S. Supreme Court's Kiobel decision on Alien Tort Statute (ATS) litigation in lower courts, and how lower courts have struggled to determine whether Kiobel permits U.S. corporations to be sued under the ATS for alleged torts in foreign countries. Read More
October 21, 2014
This collection of essays examines the shifting legal landscape of federal claims by foreign plaintiffs in the federal courts and focuses on the most common statutes invoked by foreign plaintiffs, as well as the threshold issues of personal jurisdiction and pleading standards that govern such suits. Read More
All Results for Transnational
April 23, 2018 | News
A number of legal and business experts told the West Virginia Record that more states are likely to follow Wisconsin's lead in requiring third party litigation funding transparency in state courts.... Read More
April 11, 2018 | News
U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) Senior Vice President of Legal Reform Initiatives Page Faulk told the ABA Journal Wisconsin's new law that requires disclosure of all third party litigation funding arrangements is "another step in what's become a growing movement."... Read More
April 06, 2018 | News
After Wisconsin became the first state to pass a law requiring disclosure of third party litigation funding, D&O Diary's Kevin LaCroix said the "time has come" for debate.... Read More
April 05, 2018 | News
In an interview with the National Law Journal, U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) President Lisa A. Rickard said other states should follow Wisconsin's lead by requiring third party litigation funding disclosure.... Read More
April 04, 2018 | News
Gov. Scott Walker yesterday signed a bill that makes Wisconsin the first state in the country to require disclosure of third party litigation funding arrangements, Law360 reports.... Read More
March 28, 2018 | News
A new report from the federal court administration's committee on federal civil rules found that six U.S. federal appeals courts now require some form of third party litigation funding transparency, Law360 reports.... Read More
March 21, 2018 | News
In a Wall Street Journal story on the litigation finance industry today, Allison Chock, the Chief Investment Officer for third-party litigation giant IMF Bentham, said she understands perfectly well why her industry faces criticism from civil justice groups. "We make it harder and more expensive to settle cases," she stated.... Read More
March 15, 2018 | News
Litigation Funder Deepening Ties to U.S. Law Firms; The Ecuador Saga Continues: Steven Donziger now owes Chevron more than $800,000... Read More
March 14, 2018 | News
Third Party Litigation Funder's Shares Up 30%... Read More
February 27, 2018 | News
DOJ Memo Addresses 'Parasitic' Whistleblower Cases Under False Claims Act; GKC Founders, Burford Execs Launch Plaintiff-Side Litigation Firm... Read More