Data Privacy

American businesses spend an average of $6.5 million on a single data breach, including the price of notifying potentially affected individuals and ensuing legal costs. As the amount of data collected from and about people explodes, the number of breaches has also grown. Companies affected by data breaches subsequently face significant enforcement by federal and state regulators, as well as litigation by opportunistic plaintiffs. Data privacy, as a result, is predicted to become “the new asbestos.” Reforms can help curb unreasonable costs to businesses while still providing relief to those who have truly been harmed. read more...


Information holders no longer just have to worry about whether employees are disposing of data correctly—from domestic hackers to hostile foreign governments, cyberattacks have grown in number and in sophistication. As businesses work to navigate the evolving landscape, they find themselves bombarded by federal and state regulators using outdated laws, to plaintiffs seeking large settlements despite showing no actual injury from a data breach.

It is unclear for businesses what the scope of their liability is and to whom. The U.S. has a patchwork of federal laws intended to protect personal information. At the same time, states have passed their own laws, which impose different (and sometimes contradictory) requirements for data privacy, including when and how victims of data breaches must notify their customers. Regulators have struggled to keep pace with the rising number of incidents and individuals’ concerns, with the result being a piecemeal, hastily-assembled legal regime.

A standard federal law governing breach notification requirements, preempting state laws, would provide much-needed predictability for businesses and protect them from abusive and overlapping enforcement. Moreover, vague laws prohibiting unfair and deceptive practices, from Section V of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act to state laws, are ripe for abuse; the FTC and some state attorneys general have wielded them devastatingly to go after businesses’ privacy and security practices. To make matters worse, individual and class action plaintiffs, led by the plaintiff’s bar, have jumped on the bandwagon as well.

It is important that privacy laws address real harms and place reasonable limits on liability while discouraging meritless suits that simply take advantage of businesses. Only those who are actually at risk or who have been harmed by a data breach should get notice or be able to sue. Holding businesses to impossible standards and allowing excessive and duplicative litigation hurts Americans and the economy.

Research

The ILR Research Review - Winter 2016

December 28, 2016 | This edition of the ILR Research Review offers valuable insights from ILR's latest research on the increasing use of contingency fee counsel by local governments, asbestos "double dipping," trends in trial lawyer drug and device advertising, and the public's views on data privacy liability and legal reform issues.

A Perilous Patchwork: Data Privacy and Civil Liability in the Era of the Data Breach

October 27, 2015 | This paper provides an overview of the patchwork of civil liability that U.S. companies face over data breaches, including actions by federal regulators, state attorneys general and private plaintiffs.

All Results for Data Privacy

In the News Today - February 1, 2017

February 01, 2017 | News and Blog

According to a newly released Pew Research Center study "many Americans lack faith in various public and private institutions to protect their personal information from bad actors." Out of 1,040 adults surveyed, 64 percent reported they have personally experienced a major data breach. Read More »

New FTC Chair Will Shift Data Security Focus to Actual Harm

January 27, 2017 | News and Blog

Maureen Ohlhausen was appointed acting chairwoman of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) this week. Law360 writes that she is likely to steer the FTC "away from privacy and consumer protection issues where consumer harm isn't crystal clear, and could finally answer businesses' long-standing calls for clarity on what exactly constitutes ‘reasonable' data security efforts." Read More »

In the News Today - January 11, 2017

January 11, 2017 | News and Blog

Tune in at 9:30 am EST as U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Thomas J. Donohue delivers his annual State of American Business address to outline the top challenges facing the business community and the Chamber's policy priorities for 2017. Click here to watch live. Read More »

The ILR Research Review - Winter 2016

December 28, 2016 | Research

This edition of the ILR Research Review offers valuable insights from ILR's latest research on the increasing use of contingency fee counsel by local governments, asbestos "double dipping," trends in trial lawyer drug and device advertising, and the public's views on data privacy liability and legal reform issues. Read More »

Opening Remarks: Lisa A. Rickard

October 27, 2016 | Video

Watch »

In the News Today - June 27, 2016

June 27, 2016 | News and Blog

"Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz must be wincing" over a class action suit against the company for under-filling lattes, "but perhaps he has new appreciation for those who fight America's tort-lawyer thievery." Read More »

In the News Today -- May 6, 2016

May 06, 2016 | News and Blog

Class action plaintiffs' firm Edelson PC announced that it is bringing a federal class action against an unnamed Chicago law firm over allegations of data security regarding client information. Read More »

U.S. Senate Committee Passes Data Privacy Bill

January 29, 2016 | News and Blog

The U.S. Senate yesterday passed a new data privacy bill that "would give some Europeans the right to sue in the United States over allegations of electronic data privacy violations," reports Reuters. Read More »

  • bulletClick to Narrow Your Results